From: "dis.[UR]Locate" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Subject: Re: "digital poetry" vs net art

At 03:31 AM 10/11/2002 +0000, LL wrote:
 >texts use information in form as well////

[contiguous filtering + response patternings + reification of proto.co[a]ls]

 >so what are you doing that e.e. cummings hasn't already done?

[contiguous flittering + respose patternings + deification of proto.co[a]ls]

[net.wurking thru nets.co[de]pic[torials]s]
[nod.ule =nod.url =nod.jewel =nod.jules]
[add.end[w.here.?]um n.finite]

orality is.not textual
textual is.not netscopic

sandwritinginthesandissandwriting_in_the_sand_!!
[1+0 =???]

 >what privileges your texts as net wurks and mine (even when that text
 >isn't really mine at all?)as just texts?

passive lo[a]ne construction + advertisingly projective + isolated
mono[info]thrusting

--dizzy.[UR]Locate