To: _arc.hive_@lm.va.com.au
From: "][mez][" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Subject: God_mimi.Cry_[IRC x.tracting]
Date: Tue, 09 Mar 2004 18:31:10 +1100


_______________________________________________________
God_mimi.Cry_[IRC x.tracting]     06:23pm 09/03/2004
_______________________________________________________

][mood:  dirty][
][music: 3dxxxx_tweakers][




- cloning.failure.rates +validity of essentially harvesting siblings via a 
designer process in order to combat genetic diseases
- screening.may b.acceptable +but actively engineering a child to provide 
bone marrow that will save another child =harvesting
- very Brave.New.Worldish.


+
discarded.embryos [effectively "screened" + "terminated" +2 get that 
specific.dna.clot]
+
dark.figure.cloning -thousands of faux.mutated animals [and probably 
humans] used in order 2 produce "successes".



---------------------------------------------------------------------disrupting 
the very fabric of functional} evolution.





- how.du.u.class deformity? +how r we to know that that very "deformity" 
isn't evolution on a projected scale?
- mutation.is.evolution's.[m]arrow. +should we play[@] g.od[dessa] 
+actively select who falls into that normalisation category and who doesn't??


<][mez][> no
<][mez][> we won't.



-------------------------------------------------------------we.need.2.keep.a.lid 
on +hyperaccerlation of these so called genetic fixes that

+
may effect [xxxx's] progression in terms of attempting 2


----------------------------------------------------------quantum.leap ^up^ 
the phylogenetic scale.


(vaccinations) = a social necessity
if(then) = raising ur child as part of a mainstream westernised community
= chemical buildup/antibody reactive base
= [add.ON engineering]


<][xxxx][> ..but at least its within the parameters of an enclosed system 
[if u believe current scientific theory that is]
<][xxxx][> nature [as in ecosystem-based] is contained, and part of that is 
struggle for survival and reproduction, yus?
<][xxxxx][> eros and thantos
<][xxxx[> self-replicating [and NOT individualisation] is necessary to that 
system

[housing.of.the.concept.of.evolution]

<][xxxx][> ..so i guess its playing mini-god, or god_mimickry, within 
parameters that allow for it, especially in terms of a more naturalised 
perspective.
<][xxxxxxxx][> of course as humans we are so species_centric and 
overpopulate beyond the boom/bust cycle of resource usage [ie 
lemmings-style cycle of overpopulate then actively self-cull] that we fuck 
this delicate balance up

<][xxxxx][> we hyperaccelerate beyond the parameters defined by the strict 
concept of evolution.
<][xxxx][> ..but _beyond_ the accepted pattern of functional species 
adaptation....
<][xxxxx][> the whole point of this discussion re: genetic modification is 
that nothing exists in isoltion
<][xxxxx][> isolation, even
<][xxxx][> that the whole spectrum of altering *1* organisms genetic 
behaviour [culturally decreed as well as biologically] will effect all.


[pinprick_evolution]
















.(c)[lick].
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/