Date: Mon, 22 Sep 2003 22:05:25 +1000
To: syndicate@anart.no
From: "net.l[w]urker" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Subject: Re:  LED/LCD displays (4 images)


------------=_1064239058-635-1016

At 10:55 PM 21/09/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>continuing with the idea of an LED
>numeric or alphanumeric display as
>a new type of hardware


_Sub.Mission[s]_
09:48pm 22/09/2003
   _Submission Details:_ Good thematic without being too obvious. The fact 
that they are open to realistic hybrid-collaboration is good. Very 
competent cvs and professsionalism evident. Would work well with a more 
experimentally-directed collaboration set.

_Support Material:_
i) Audio [xxxxxxx]: well-paced and innovative but slightly formulaic in 
terms of soundtrackesqueness. Might be a problem when seeking to pair with 
a writer/txter than uses other benchmarkers in terms of actual xxxxx 
construction.

ii) Video [xxxxxx]: production stills illustrate competent visual 
referencing and potential for image creation. Video constructions are 
filmic in intent and slickly produced [high production values evident] but 
possibly too polished [rigid] for xxxxx unless paired with appropriate 
collaborator.


RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 7/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 8/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 9.5/10

--


_Submission Details:_ CV slightly sketchy due to the early stage of 
careers. Submission concept more digitally inclined which is promising, but 
overall limited strength of submission direction.

_Support Material:_
i) Videos: good integration of digital affects, less centred on fimic 
conventions. Nice reworking of video material.

ii) Text: Less strong in terms of supporting submission.

RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 6.5/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 7/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 8/10

--


_Submission Details:_ Extremely integrated collaborative team is evident 
thru proposal. Such employment of heavy mono-directed themes [eg cvs and 
conceptual nature of submission] seems not as relevant towards xxxxxx aims 
+ emphasis on 2-fold narrative process less than applicable to xxxxxx in 
terms of the quality of other, more appropriate applicants.

_Support Material:_
i) Audio: xxxxx : etheral + performative in nature.
xxxxxx: experimental, interesting. focus less on fractured soundscapes + 
more on directed audio.

ii) Text [various]: Good level of writing skills but again, more focused on 
traditional execution than seems relevant to here.


RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 6/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 6/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 7/10

--



_Submission Details:_ Very traditional in expressive orientation and 
collaborative structuring [ie sticking to defined fields of expertise]. Not 
overtly relevant or appropriate to xxxxxxx.

_Support Material:_
ii) Text [script + poetry + fiction]: Again, too heavily boxed in terms of 
acceptable methods of creative output.

RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 4/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 5/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 6/10

--



_Submission Details:_ Brings interesting background to this project [ie 
science oriented] but not totally appropriate in terms of cv or support 
material.


RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 6/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 6/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 5/10

--



_Submission Details:_ Excellent concept/proposal.


RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 8/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 8/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 9/10

--



_Submission Details:_ Nice open-ended ambiguity in terms of expectations 
and creative control in regards to project. Could work well if paired with 
graffiti oriented artist[s].

_Support Material:_
i) Text: Straight poetry that reads as hip-hop [lyrically].

RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 6/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 6/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 8/10

--



_Submission Details:_

_Support Material:_
i) Audio:

ii) Text:


RATINGS:
- ARTISTIC VALUE OF CONCEPT: 6/10
- POTENTIAL FOR ARTISTIC REALISATION: 6/10
- VALUE OF EXPERIENCE/INTERPRETED CAPACITY TO COMPLETE PROJECT: 7/10




- pro][rating][.lucid.txt
-
-

http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker
http://www.livejournal.com/users/netwurker/
_
_cr[xxx]oss ova.ring.


------------=_1064239058-635-1016
Content-Disposition: inline; filename="message-footer.txt"


-----Syndicate mailinglist-----------------------
Syndicate network for media culture and media art
information and archive: http://anart.no/~syndicate
to post to the Syndicate list: <syndicate@anart.no>
Shake the KKnut: http://anart.no/~syndicate/KKnut
no commercial use of the texts without permission
------------=_1064239058-635-1016--