From: 6digit@galeon.com
To: _arc.hive_@lm.va.com.au
Subject: shrink fodder
Date: Thu, 12 Jun 2003 12:26:18 +0200

Shrink Fodder




Hi! I'm Eliza. What's your problem?


>This is not a text, really.

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>It's an arena for intervention

What does that suggest to you?


>Yours to mess around with at will.

I see.


>This is not a text, really.

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>It seems to have a structure, a cadence...

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>A syntax all its own...

Can you elaborate on that?


>But that's only an illusion...

That is quite interesting.


>...to make you feel like you're fucking around with, like,
real meaning...

We were discussing you--not me.


>It is closer to speech than anything ever printed

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>This is not a text, really.

What does that suggest to you?


>It can break up and make up right before your eyes.

Why are you concerned about my eyes?


>Signifiance as spectacle, mythopoiesis at the touch of a
mouse- button...

I see.


>This is not a text, really.

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>Infinite meaning, endless free-form permutation...

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>Recombinant matrix, performative text-fingering...

Can you elaborate on that?


>A deconstructivist's utopia...

That is quite interesting.


>This is not a text, really.

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>It's more like a living creature

What does that suggest to you?


>An Amazonian rainforest, an unplanned economy

I see.


>This is not a text, really.

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>There are no limits, no rules, no selection.

Are you saying no just to be negative?


>It's horizontal, rhizomatic, deluded, deleuzian...

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>This is not a text, really.

Can you elaborate on that?


>It's far from grammatical regulations and semantic
coherence

That is quite interesting.


>Oh no, that's for girls, you know...

You are being a bit negative.


>Us, we know what we want and we know how to get it

Why do you ask?


>This is not a text, really.

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>It's more like the thoughts that cross the fly's mind...

What does that suggest to you?


>...as it crashes against the clean surface of a window.

I see.


>Signifiance prints a text-fingering

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>A right getting permutation gets a text-fingering

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>A text crosses at a free-form matrix

Can you elaborate on that?


>A mythopoiesis prints to an infinite matrix

That is quite interesting.


>A grammatical cadence only crashes up a clean syntax

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>A regulation only messes up cadences

What does that suggest to you?


>A will crashes with a free-form coherence

I see.


>Coherence text-fingers the grammatical and semantic
meanings

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>A deconstructivist text-fingers against a clean spectacle

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>Eye makes the clean and real meanings

Can you elaborate on that?


>A recombinant anything is an infinite girl

That is quite interesting.


>An infinite anything is an endless regulation

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>A right making permutation text-fingers an infinite
coherence

What does that suggest to you?


>Speech seems an illusion
I see.


>A clean spectacle is an endless text...

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>Mythopoiesis prints the recombinant and infinite syntaxes

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>A real will really text-fingers with an infinite will

Can you elaborate on that?


>Regulation breaks the clean and semantic utopias

That is quite interesting.


>A really text-fingering touch feels a clean meaning

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>An eye gets at an endless touch

What does that suggest to you?


>A syntax breaks at a recombinant permutation

I see.


>Speech makes the recombinant and infinite spectacles

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>Girl prints a speech given

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>Eye has the real and free-form utopias

Can you elaborate on that?


>Eye has a will, and...

That is quite interesting.


>A real spectacle is an infinite girl

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>A mouse-button fucks against an endless spectacle

What does that suggest to you?


>Structure prints an illusion, so....

I see.


>An endless illusion is a semantic mythopoiesis?

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>An infinite cadence is an infinite text-fingering

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>A girl only prints against interventions

Can you elaborate on that?


>An ever breaking matrix fucks a free-form permutation

That is quite interesting.


>A touch only makes up spectacles

Say, do you have any psychological problems?


>Will knows the grammatical and real cadences

What does that suggest to you?


>Girl gets the recombinant and infinite eyes

I see.


>Text wants the endless and real syntaxes

I'm not sure I understand you fully.


>A structure crashes before an endless girl

Come come elucidate your thoughts.


>shut up

Okay if you feel that way I'll shut up.

>




10/06/2003


Kamen Nedev
http://www.6digit.tk
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
¿Quieres conocer tu futuro? Te leemos las cartas de forma personalizada en el 906 150 305

http://www.miwebcam.com/dialers/hispatarot/

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

¡Averigua si está libre tu nombre de dominio! http://dominios.hispavista.com