To: webartery@yahoogroups.com
From: "dis.[UR]Locate" <netwurker@hotkey.net.au>
Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2002 14:12:31 +1100
Subject: Re:  Fwd: Re: RHIZOME_RAW: "digital we[ave]tting" vs

At 02:57 AM 10/11/2002 +0000, you wrote:
>if i'm not mistaken, mez here is proposing the works exist in a
>certain communicative channel...they're a flow of data////like all
>things really are////


_form from_

or even

_form form_


>my question would be (and the answer to this would actually help me
>distinguish between works): where does the data come from? where does
>it flow to?

_net.wurks_ u.se[e] information.

<d.fine: information?>

_in form_


>one can say (as in romanticism): well, the data comes from somewhere
>up there: it flows into me, and then out:::::all of which is true////
>

up there: no
in2: no
out: no

[a trip.tick.ler of nos].
[think no.dic[k]|x.plosive, la[la laaaa li]terally.]

>but the works i like best are those in which data comes from several
>sources (not simply repsawning my own): data comes from you, and you,
>and you, and you, and you=====and goes to you and you and you and
>you////

u & u & u.

[ewes & use = cul.pa[lata]ble comprehension].

>this is interesting to me because it's pointing to an epitemology of
>net art (or at least an epistemology of mez's work, which interests
>me greatly)////
>
>but i still don't understand why they're not texts? how would you
>define a text, mez? and what is the distinction between that and what
>you do?

i _net.wurk_.

[u text b.coz u r].
[i net.wurk b.coz i am
w.here.].
[u purr.[d]sist in b.ing .here.]

oppositional here|w.here.






. . .... .....
pro][tean][.lapsing.txt
.
.
www.cddc.vt.edu/host/netwurker/
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/
http://www.hotkey.net.au/~netwurker/display.myopia.swf

.... . .??? .......


 

Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/